I agree

Could not have said it better... Thank You!

I disagree. I really think hegre is against heterosexuality in its most natural form. At first it was declared this would be more classy so no sex would be involved but wah we have hard core oral with completion all over her face and in her mouth but oh no vaginal sex is off limits. Unless your into some weird form of chastity denial form of bdsm this experience is always unfulfilling. I'm sure hegre is trying to be profound in denying actual intercourse in his art but in my opinion its actually kind of lame and diminishes and devalues all the emotional build up that occurred through out the scene. Hegre has demonstrated he can make us have feeling for these women. But theres something sadistic and pretentious about his repeated denials of what comes most naturally in sex. Yes I feel it is a kind of sadistic that rather then just hiding penetration while its actually happening or even fakeing penetration like a sexy love scene in a movie he's straight up insulting you with "nope its not happening sucker". To me thats not artistic thats just pretentious of him. No offense but dare I ask is hegre a homosexual that gets off to doing this to his audience? He only seems to respect the oral aspect of love making and full on tounge insertions during female to female sex. I just have to wonder what his motivation is.

I agree with Heyman, you can make love without penetration (just ask a woman). Sometimes it's the very absence of penetration that makes it more erotic and arousing. But, of course, I'm sure we all enjoy "arriving".

love making is not necessarily penetration... love has many names.

You're right, the cinematography is exquisite. As to the other things you'd like to see, perhaps we shall see in a future movie.

enjoy your constructive feedback, but from what I understand, here they focus on the journey and not necessarily always crossing the finishing line.

Agreed.

do not agree, this is true sexual healing.